




Employers often run background checks during the hiring process. In some cases, those checks include a look at an applicant’s financial history. This report can contain information about past debts, payment history, accounts sent to collections, or bankruptcy filings.
Companies argue that this information helps evaluate financial responsibility. Employers assume that reviewing credit is a routine part of screening.
In many situations our team at Brandon J. Broderick has reviewed over the years, applicants only realize their financial history played a role after a job offer disappears. Often, the first indication comes when a background check raises questions about debt or financial history.
When an employer relies on a credit report in hiring, this violates New Jersey’s restrictions.
This article explains how the restrictions work, which positions qualify for the limited exceptions, what job applicants should watch for during the hiring process, and when it’s time to consult an employment lawyer in New Jersey.
Employment background checks often include a review of credit history. When employers request this information, they usually obtain it through a consumer reporting agency. These are the same companies that provide information to lenders and landlords.
Employers who use background checks often say it helps them assess financial responsibility. Companies claim that financial records help identify potential risks, such as employees who could be vulnerable to fraud or pressure.
Positions in financial services or banking are common examples. Someone who manages personal finances carefully is viewed as more trustworthy.
Employers usually don’t receive an applicant’s credit score. But the documentation generally shows financial history, including outstanding debts and late payments.
This can paint a picture of someone’s financial past, yet it doesn’t explain the circumstances behind it. But financial strain is tied to workplace problems themselves, including situations where employees were dealing with unpaid overtime or other wage issues.
By 2021, credit reports became common. Roughly 51% of employers conduct credit checks for certain roles during the hiring process. But because these documents contain sensitive personal information, employers can’t access them freely.
Federal law places strict limits on when and how financial history can be used in employment decisions.
“The decision to speak up is powerful. But knowing what happens after — and how to protect yourself — is just as critical.”
— Olivia Rhye
Credit checks used in hiring are regulated by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Since 1970, it has set the rules for how they are used in employment decisions.
When an employer wants to obtain a credit report, the FCRA requires several steps before the information is requested.
First, the employer must tell the applicant in writing. The notice has to be clear and separate from other paperwork. Employers must get written permission from the applicant before ordering the report.
If the employer later decides not to hire someone because of this information, additional rules apply. The FCRA refers to this type of decision as “adverse action.” That includes withdrawing a job offer.
Before making the final decision, the employer must provide what is called a pre-adverse action notice. This notice typically includes:
This step gives the applicant a chance to review the document and dispute errors before the employer moves forward with the decision.
After giving the applicant time to respond, the employer issued a final adverse action notice. This confirms the decision and identifies the reporting company.
Employers generally cannot obtain credit reports without consent. In many of the cases our team at Brandon J. Broderick has worked on over the years, disputes begin when applicants or employees discover that background checks were handled improperly.
If someone inside a company raises concerns about unlawful checks or unauthorized screening, these actions fall under whistleblower protections.
In New Jersey, the primary whistleblower law is the Conscientious Employee Protection Act (CEPA), which protects workers from retaliation.


New Jersey has its own version of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, focusing on transparency.
This means employers can’t obtain a credit report as part of a bigger background check. Job applicants must be told what is happening and agree to it before it’s requested.
Under New Jersey law, employers must:
These records can come from third-party screening companies that collect data from public records. Applicants also have certain rights if the information is used during the hiring process. For example:
The reports contain sensitive financial and personal information. For example, workers in lower-paid positions, including jobs that rely on the tipped minimum wage, often face unstable income that affects their credit history even when they are performing their jobs responsibly.
New Jersey law requires employers to be upfront when that information becomes part of a hiring decision.
Learn More: Should You Sign a Severance Agreement Without a Lawyer? Everything You need to know.
Background checks don’t automatically violate the law. But a system that looks neutral still violates the law if it disproportionately harms a protected group. This is known as disparate impact discrimination.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment practices that discriminate based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
As a result, a policy that automatically rejects applicants with poor credit could affect certain groups more than others. It can also become evidence of racial bias, even if the policy itself doesn’t mention race.
It can be a red flag when a hiring policy:
When this type of policy produces unequal outcomes, the employer must show that the practice is necessary for the position.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has warned employers that credit history alone isn’t a reliable predictor of job performance or honesty. Financial problems can happen for many reasons that have nothing to do with a person’s ability to do their job.
Common causes include:
In our experience reviewing workplace disputes, these hiring practices often appear alongside other signs of bias. Hostile remarks such as racial slurs or offensive jokes point to a broader culture of discrimination.
Blanket policies that rely too heavily on previous history create legal risk if they screen out qualified applicants for reasons unrelated to the job.
In just 2024, the EEOC recovered nearly $700 million for workers who experienced workplace discrimination.
Federal law gives job applicants certain rights when employers use consumer reports. These protections come mainly from the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
First, applicants are entitled to know when information from a credit report is used. This happens before the employer finalizes the decision. It gives the applicant a chance to challenge any mistakes.
If an applicant believes that incorrect information was provided, they can:
Some estimates suggest that roughly one in five Americans has a mistake on at least one credit report. Because of this risk, the law requires companies to remove disputed information that cannot be verified.
Two federal agencies play a role in enforcing these rules:
Federal law and state law both set clear rules for how credit reports enter the hiring process.
Such records contain sensitive financial details. Late payments or bankruptcy often reflect difficult life events rather than job performance. Relying only on those entries leads to an unfair decision.
Financial history shouldn’t quietly decide someone’s ability to get a job. When employers ignore the rules, applicants have the right to question them.
If you believe a credit report affected your job application or employment opportunity, speaking with an experienced employment attorney can help you understand your rights.

Stop wondering about your rights or if you'll be taken seriously. We treat every client with respect, urgency, and honesty. Our lawyers will listen, explain your legal options, and fight for the outcome you deserve.