




You’re leaving a company and a severance agreement hits your inbox. The draft looks standard: payment, release, maybe COBRA language — and then a few dense paragraphs on confidentiality and non-disparagement. Buried in there, you may also find a promise that the company will give a “neutral” job reference and, in exchange, you agree not to “say anything negative”.
That sounds shady. In New Jersey, though, these clauses have real limits — especially when your exit overlaps with claims of discrimination, harassment, or retaliation. And because references are the bridge to your next job, what you sign about speech can quietly shape what former managers are allowed to say about you and what you can say about them.
Let’s break this down: what non-disparagement actually does, where the law draws a bright line, how older workers’ severance waivers must be structured, and how a severance agreement lawyer in New Jersey can help you protect yourself without compromising your future.
Since 2019, New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) has banned contract or settlement terms that have the purpose or effect of concealing the details of a discrimination, retaliation, or harassment claim.
It doesn’t matter what the clause is called — confidentiality, non-disclosure, or non-disparagement — if it operates as a gag about the underlying allegations, it is against public policy and unenforceable against the employee.
In May 2024, the New Jersey Supreme Court made its stance clear in Savage v. Township of Neptune. The Court held that an agreement can’t use a non-disparagement label to do what NJLAD forbids a confidentiality clause from doing: namely, prevent a worker from speaking about the facts of a discrimination case.
This principle also connects to another growing issue: out-of-state jurisdiction clauses in severance. Some employers attempt to shift disputes to another state’s courts or laws, where worker protections may be weaker. Before signing, it’s wise to consult an experienced attorney in New Jersey to review your severance agreement, ensure the state’s law still governs your rights, and flag any problem that could limit your legal protections.
Not every non-disparagement clause is illegal: but it’s critical to know when you should agree to a non-disparagement clause and when it crosses the legal line. Clauses that don’t restrict discussion of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment — for instance, a narrowly worded, mutual promise not to make knowingly false or malicious statements about the other party’s products or finances — can still be lawful.
“The decision to speak up is powerful. But knowing what happens after — and how to protect yourself — is just as critical.”
— Olivia Rhye
Separate from NJLAD, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) protects most non-supervisory employees’ rights to speak with each other about working conditions, pay, and workplace issues — even after they leave.
In 2023, the NLRB’s McLaren Macomb decision concluded that overly broad non-disparagement and confidentiality terms in severance agreements can unlawfully restrain those rights. The Board’s guidance explains that any such clause must be narrowly tailored, typically limited to defamatory or maliciously false statements, and should not prohibit discussions of workplace concerns with co-workers, unions, or the NLRB. Courts continue to weigh aspects of this rule, but the Board’s position remains a powerful check on gag language in severance agreements.
Practically, that means a non-disparagement clause you’re asked to sign should be carefully cabined — content-limited, time-limited, and expressly preserving your right to discuss work conditions, to file charges, and to cooperate with agencies.


Most non-disparagement provisions govern what you can say after separation — but many are mutual, meaning they also limit what the employer can say about you. That becomes especially important when negotiating severance in the tech industry or healthcare, where reputation and future references can make or break your next opportunity.
You can shape reference outcomes and still keep your legal speech rights intact — it’s not an either-or choice. Beyond fine-tuning the language around references, non-disparagement, or confidentiality, you can also request practical support such as outplacement services or career coaching in severance packages.
New Jersey’s rule is simple: a severance clause cannot be used to hide the facts of discrimination, retaliation, or harassment. The Savage decision ensures that calling a gag “non-disparagement” doesn’t change that. Layer in the NLRA’s limits on broad gag terms and the OWBPA protections for older workers, and you have a clear path to a fair deal: secure pay and benefits, craft reference language that helps you land your next role, and keep your legal speech rights intact.
If you see a clause that chills protected speech — or if someone tries to enforce one against you — New Jersey and federal law give you tools to push back.
If you’re weighing a severance agreement that includes non-disparagement language and a “neutral reference,” we can help you strike the right balance — protecting your next job search while preserving your rights under New Jersey and federal law.
We review and negotiate severance terms every day and can tailor the clauses to your situation.

Stop wondering about your rights or if you'll be taken seriously. We treat every client with respect, urgency, and honesty. Our lawyers will listen, explain your legal options, and fight for the outcome you deserve.