




Social media work often starts as a short-term fix. A company needs help quickly. Engagement is declining, a product launch is approaching, or a new platform is not performing as expected. The business wants someone available to respond when issues arise.
To meet that need, companies hire social media workers as “freelancers” or “independent contractors.” The setup looks simple. There is a short agreement, a 1099 form, and pay structured as a monthly retainer or per-post rate. Access to company accounts, brand guidelines, and posting schedules is provided.
Over time, the relationship can change. Ongoing meetings are added. Content calendars require approval. The worker is expected to be available during business hours. Competitor work may be restricted. That shift matters in New Jersey, where worker status is determined by law, not by labels or forms.
At Brandon J. Broderick, our attorneys frequently examine these provisions once the working relationship has ended and a conflict arises.
In this article, we’ll discuss how the state’s law classifies social media roles, how crisis response creates on-call expectations, how brand voice guides can function like handbooks, and when it’s time to consult an independent contractor misclassification lawyer in New Jersey.
The Garden State uses what is commonly called the ABC test. The New Jersey Supreme Court confirmed its broad application in Hargrove v. Sleepy’s, LLC, and it plays a central role in the state’s wage-and-hour and unemployment law.
The NJDOL explains that the employer has the burden to show the worker meets all three parts to be treated as an independent contractor:
Being asked to form an LLC or sign an agreement does not decide whether you are a contractor or an employee. The business still has to meet the ABC test. If there is uncertainty about how these rules apply, a misclassification attorney in New Jersey can help evaluate the situation.
At the federal level, the law follows a different framework that also affects compensation for misclassified workers.
The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) applies the “economic reality” test to determine a worker’s status.
For federal tax purposes, the Internal Revenue Service uses a related but distinct analysis focused on control and independence. It evaluates behavioral control, financial control, and the overall relationship between the parties.
New Jersey, however, takes a stricter approach. Proposed 2025 regulations would formally recognize the ABC test as the default standard and reaffirm the business’s obligations.
Enforcement activity reflects that focus: the New Jersey Department of Labor has recovered about $84 million since 2018, including $19 million in 2024, and assessed roughly $37 million in back wages in the first half of 2025 alone.
These figures illustrate the significant employer penalties that can follow misclassification.
“The decision to speak up is powerful. But knowing what happens after — and how to protect yourself — is just as critical.”
— Olivia Rhye
Traditional supervision looks like a manager assigning tasks and checking work. Social media supervision can look different. In many roles, the algorithm is the timekeeper, and the company uses the algorithm’s demands to control the worker. This dynamic is common with misclassified writers, graphic designers, photographers, and managers.
It can show up in simple instructions that are treated as non-negotiable:
The worker may be told they have schedule flexibility. But if the required work must occur at specific engagement windows, that flexibility is limited.
When the company sets the required posting times, the required response windows, and the required monitoring periods, the worker is not operating as a truly independent business deciding how and when to deliver a product. The worker is meeting the company’s operational timetable.
If the company demands constant monitoring and rapid response, it is functionally setting availability rules.


A brand voice guide is often reasonable, as companies aim to protect their reputation. But the finer details can carry significant weight in misclassification disputes, particularly for remote freelancers.
Some “voice guides” are short and high-level: tone, key messages, and basic guardrails. Others look like employment manuals for communication:
At a certain point, the work stops being “deliver a marketing service” and starts being “perform communication duties according to internal policy.”
When a company dictates not only what must be achieved but also the methods, language, escalation process, and day-to-day decision limits, it treats the worker as part of its internal structure.
This is one area where social media differs from many other freelance marketing services. Workers often speak as the brand in real time, not simply produce content. They function as the company’s public voice.
In social media, content calendars are used as planning tools. In future disputes, they can also function as schedules. A content calendar can include:
If the calendar is collaborative and the freelancer proposes timelines, that can support an independent model. But if the calendar is imposed and the worker is expected to follow it like a shift schedule, it starts to look like employer control.
This is especially true when schedules are tied to internal meetings, approvals, and expectations, such as:
Coverage language is telling because it implies staffing.
In a truly independent model, the worker might be contracted for deliverables: number of posts, number of edits, number of videos, number of campaign assets. In an employee-like model, the worker is hired for presence: being there when the business needs them.
Social media work has a distinct feature: it can turn into a crisis response without warning. A customer complaint escalates, a product issue trends, or a news story breaks. In those moments, many businesses expect their manager to respond immediately, regardless of hours. The worker becomes on-call.
In our experience with handling misclassification matters, some independent consultants do offer crisis coverage as a premium service. But the classification risk rises when:
This is a pattern our legal team sees repeatedly in many larger cases across industries. If a business expects a “freelancer” to be on call, that means the business is relying on them as an operational employee.
Social media managers are often pulled into the company’s communication systems in ways that look like regular employment:
Slack can become a virtual office where the “freelancer” is expected to be present and responsive like staff.
Truly independent contractors typically control their own workflow. They may coordinate with the client, but they are not usually integrated into the client’s internal communication structure as an always-available team member.
The risk of misclassification increases when:
That again points back to prong A of the ABC test, and also prong C if the worker cannot realistically operate an independent business while being “on” for one client all day.
Many roles in the creative industry often appear freelance because the worker uses personal equipment, like laptops and camera gear.
Businesses sometimes cite this as proof of independent contractor status: “they use their own tools, so they must be independent.”
But tool ownership is only one part of the analysis. In many modern workplaces, employees also use their own devices. The more meaningful question is: who controls production?
In social media work, the company frequently controls:
A worker may provide the equipment while the company controls how the work is created and delivered.
The issue becomes even more complicated because social media professionals often pay for subscriptions that primarily benefit the business. That can create the appearance of entrepreneurship while the worker remains operationally dependent.
One subtle warning sign in “freelance” roles is training. Independent contractors are usually engaged for their own expertise and working methods. They may learn a client’s brand or product, but they are not typically trained in the same way as new employees.
In social media roles, training can include:
Some onboarding is normal. But when it becomes extensive and resembles orientation, it could be the first red flag.
Training also relates to control. If the company teaches specific methods, scripts, workflows, and procedures, it is directing not only the outcome but the process. This is often where “freelance” becomes a convenient label. The business receives employee-level integration without employee-level obligations.
Freelance social media work can be a genuine independent business. Many professionals choose their clients, set their pricing, and control how the work gets done.
But in a growing number of situations, “freelance” is only a label while the relationship functions like employment.
When a company dictates schedules through platform demands, uses brand guides as internal policy, and treats the worker as part of daily operations, the classification deserves closer review.
Contact us for a free consultation to review your situation and understand your options.

Stop wondering about your rights or if you'll be taken seriously. We treat every client with respect, urgency, and honesty. Our lawyers will listen, explain your legal options, and fight for the outcome you deserve.